( Freedom All the TIME )

Archive for July 20, 2012


Awesome Music for Planting TREES……….

I will Call of for Today  With this awesome song, reminds me of Planting more Trees, Cause  For Mother Earth a new tree is like a breath of fresh air, it helps her breathe and with her being probably as old as the sun, some fresh and new air will certainly be like an injection of youthfulness. She will be forever grateful and reward you with fruits for your labor and shade from the sun. This Trees Existed Long before the Dinosaurs and still exist today……

It is a very easy thing to do. Get a seedling of any tree you like and you know can grow in your area. You can plant it anywhere you want like your garden, in the woods, country and even in the park nearby. If it´s not allowed planting a tree somewhere you would like to give your tree a home to, ask the competent authorities for permission or just do it. Who wants to blame you for that? Start a night action with a group of people, everyone with a seedling in his hand and start planting.
It´s not the world, but we give nature a hand.

One day we will see our tree be grown beautifully big and strong. And we can be proud of ourselves, can´t we.

“Let earth be green again”




SaLuSa 7-20-12…”Your Personal Path To Ascension Is The One That Is Important, So Do Not Be Unduly Concerned As To How More General Events Work Out”



The days pass by and the work of our allies is becoming more coordinated, and it is bearing results. The scale of activities is becoming bigger and soon there will be an overwhelming push forward that will be very noticeable. We are working now on many fronts and expect to see some rapid developments very shortly. Your role in what is happening is to hold your focus on what you perceive as the outcome, thus giving it more energy where it is needed. At the same time powerful streams of energy are reaching the Earth from many other sources and Galaxies. The interest and assistance being given to you is immense, and certain to help you achieve your goal which is Ascension. For our part we stop any attempt to prevent it, and use our technologies to ensure both you and Mother Earth reach your destination. It is necessary as the dark Ones will resort to any means, even if it threatens their own existence. Have no fear, we are in control and they are well aware that we stand in their way.

Those souls who are unaware of the end times, obviously put a different interpretation on events that are going on around them. It is understandable that they fear the outcome, but be assured that as our allies follow their course of action it will be evident that a force for good does exist. Like you we wish to see an ever growing purge of the criminals who are responsible for taking away your rights. Once it becomes public knowledge it will enforce the idea that you are not alone in your fight against evil. Indeed that has been the case for a very long time, and members of the Galactic Federation of Light can take credit for guiding your experiences in such a way that you have survived. There has additionally been careful planning over a long period of time to keep the balance of energies upon the Earth. That was partly achieved by arranging for highly enlightened souls to incarnate at appropriate times to lead you forward in the Light.

Understand that your experiences are the result of the Law of Attraction, that has allowed the souls of a lower vibration to join you. The vibrations of Earth in comparatively recent times have in fact dropped considerably, and as a freewill planet it has been left to find its own level. However, when the decision was made to increase the vibrations, we became more involved in your upliftment. Today you stand tall and realize that you have achieved a remarkable turnaround in a very short period, particularly during the last 40 years or so. There is no going back, as the Light is now well established upon Earth and still growing. It is increasing exponentially and will soon reach a point when Ascension can take place.

Man people look for some outlet for their abilities to contribute to the changes. You are known to us and at the right time you will find an opportunity to use them. In the present time, by merely being a point of Light and spreading your peace around you will help others. There will also be occasions when questions will be asked for which you can give answers, so do not hesitate to do so. Clearly some people are not ready to hear the truth, but there is no longer the time left to hide it away. There is ultimately only the One Truth and that will be made fully known in good time, as there are souls who are ready to receive it. Hitherto you have followed your inclinations and achieved your own understanding, but there has to come a time when the Truth is needed to bring you all together

Your personal path to Ascension is the one that is important, so do not be unduly concerned as to how more general events work out. Certainly the changes we have promised you will come to pass, as the old structures must make way for those of the New Age. Your awareness has been opened to all of the new possibilities and they will come into your lives, but some are more long term and will follow on the after the initial changes have occurred. The Governmental changes are obviously vital to allow a more spiritual representation amongst those who will lead you. Instead of putting self first they will honor their oath to serve you, and will be chosen for that reason. Most governments throughout the world stopped serving the people a long time ago, and allowed themselves to become vassals of the powerful banking families. They also must be removed from power plus their largely ill gotten gains, and also their minions who are to be found all over the world. The extent of the Illuminati power will astonish you, and it reaches into the most high places including royalty and religion.

A vast empire such as the Illuminati’s cannot be dismantled overnight, but now it has been severely weakened it will fall apart. Those at the top know their time is nearly up, and we still hope that they will surrender and cease their actions against you. Their plans cannot be viewed as less than horrific, and set out to severely reduce the population of Earth by whatever means they could use. Two World Wars and many others since the first one took place have caused the loss of millions of lives, and have been started deliberately to engulf the world in turmoil and disaster. A third World War was planned but we have stepped in and prevented steps to start it in the Middle East. Indeed, we have put a stop to the use of nuclear devices as weapons of war, as divinely decreed.

There will no hiding place where they can avoid our detection, and undergroundbases will be destroyed so that they cannot be used again. Neither will there be any escape for the guilty who are known to us, and will be prevented from continuing their actions against you. One day they will fully understand the extent to which they have contributed to the Illuminati plan, and its total affect [effect] upon the population right down to how each individual has been affected. It will be a time to reflect upon their disobedience of the Laws of the Universe, and they will answer to God. As with any soul who has fallen so far as to have forgotten that their true selves are of Light, they will be given every chance to find their way back.

I am SaLuSa from Sirius, and tell you that the fallen are equally loved by God, who does not judge any soul but surrounds them in Love and Light.

Thank you SaLuSa.
Mike Quinsey.

Behind The Curtain of Deception

Socialism needs two legs on which to stand; a right and a left.
While appearing to be in complete opposition to one another,
they both march in the same direction.”
— Paul Proctor

The false “left vs right” paradigm is a distraction. Both political parties are CONTROLLED by the Corporate/Global Elites

You think that the Matrix movie and George Orwell’s book 1984 is all fiction? Think it couldn’t happen in reality? Read on:

David Rockefeller of the wealthy Rockefeller banking elite once said in a speech to the Trilateral Commission ( a pro-world government policy group), “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries“.

Notice that Rockefeller said that he and other pro world government banking oligarchs are “grateful to the New York Times, Time magazine” among other corporate funded “news” outlets for basically concealing their globalist agenda from the public. He said it wouldn’t be possible to arrange a one-world government suitable to the desires of the “intellectual elite and world bankers” behind the scenes if it wasn’t for the “mainstream” media’s propaganda. The “mainstream” media is controlled by Wall Street and international banker interests. This media acts as a stage curtain. On one side it hides the deceitful agenda of the globalist elite and on the other side, in order to divert attention away from this fact, they feed the unknowing public “news” that really has nothing to do with what’s really going on. Why do you think the newspapers are “bailed out” by this financial oligarchy? It’s because just a Rockefeller said they have an agreement with the globalists to sell you a sack of lies while they move behind the scenes stripping our liberty and our nation’s sovereignty away. Again Rockefeller said he was “grateful to…Time magazine” among others and wouldn’t you know that Time magazine frequently promotes on its cover the so-called man-made “global warming”. The only thing about about global warming are the man-made lies that are being told about it. Little do you know that global warming is another vehicle for the globalist elite to achieve their dream of global governance? How so? Adolf Hitler once said “make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”. To repeat the lie in Time magazine, the New York Times and on the local “mainstream” news that man causes global warming, people will start to believe it. Then the globalists in the government will run to our rescue and say, “this is a job only bigger government can solve” and the masses don’t call their bluff because they took the globalist bait hook line and sinker. The globalists know that they can not win their argument if they use logic so instead they silence dissent and use emotionally charged public relations pieces that the mainstream media call “news”. They try to appeal to our emotions by showing clips of some polar bears and then cutting to some clips of melting ice caps. Mark my words, eventually they will change their tune and say that “man-made” global warming is a problem only an international or world government can solve. People who disagree with their global warming religioncould be called “environmental terrorists” in the future.

Philosopher George Hegel came up with a three part philosophical theory called ‘Dialectics’. It’s also called “management by crisis” by students of the founder of communism Karl Marx in which the existing idea or society (the thesis) produces or creates a reaction of opposition to it ( the antithesis). Finally the conflict between the two would give rise to the solution (the synthesis). The financial and political elite who orchestrate, finance and manage the clash of opposites from behind the scenes can remain in control of the synthesis. Now notice that President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, “You never want to let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before” (emphasis mine). Hillary Clinton echoed the remark as well on anothe occasion. Don’t you see what the globalists are doing? They are using the same strategies Adolf Hitler used. AdolfHilter had his Nazi regime start the Reichstag fire and blamed it on the Jews and other political enemies All this was done to get the power to authorize the law that was called The Enabling Act and through it Hitler obtained dictatorial powers. The Enabling Act was supposed to be used only in times of extreme emergency. But Hitler in his thirst for power had the Reichstag (Germany’s parliament) building burned to the ground to justify the use of The Enabling ActThis law granted to him for “national security” reasons enabled him to run the state with absolute power. You think it couldn’t happen in America? Please don’t be that naive.

The people behind the curtain of deception know they can’t make war profits on an endless war on “terrorism” and use it to make government power and control grow under the disguise of “national security” if they don’t have an “enemy”. They are using or staging the current crises facing America to do things they “could not do before” the crises existed. In addition to the war on terrorism these crises include the so-called “man-made” global warming, the devaluation of our currency and an imploded housing market which caused the credit crisis. All of these crises lead to jobs being lost, leading many to rely on government welfare. All of this results in their globalists’ solution: bigger government, which will eventually lead to an international or world government as the globalists’ solution to “solve” society’s ills. Can’t you see that the Hegelian dialectic is being used to secure and sustain absolute world power and authority to the international banking elite? As President Franklin D. Roosevelt once said, In politics there are no accidents. If it happens you can bet it was planned that way.” And there’s plenty of evidence that says that 9/11 wasn’t an accident but rather was well planned and not by some gave dweller named Osama Bin Laden. Rather it was planned by people a little closer to home. But don’t take my word for it, do the research and your eyes WILL be opened. Of course the Federal Reserve is printing to much paper money and by doing so they are purposely creating price inflation. Why? Because they know that means that it will cause the purchasing power of the dollar to drop. Which means most Americans may have to work two or three jobs just to keep up with their bills and savings and they’ll be too busy to investigate what’s really going on. Therefore remaining ignorant to the truth and remain vulnerable to the greedy interests of the international banking/political establishment. They do not want you to know what they are doing and they are trying to manipulate your lives so that you NEVER will know.

James Warburg (Council on Foreign Relations member) once declared to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee twenty-five years ago: “We will have world government whether or not you like it-by conquest or consent“. Who is the “we” that he is talking about? He is talking about the people behind the New World Order. This list includes the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the UN, the international bankers (Rothschilds, the Rockefellers etc) behind the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the corporate elite behind Wall Street and the Bilderberg Group which is just a front for the Illuminati. These globalists also have their political puppets in Washington D.C. as corrupt America-hating politicians from both Democrat and Republican parties are connected to and or have sold out to these globalists. World Net Daily in an article entitled “Will Secret Clubs Pick Next Prez” said, “According to a variety of sources, the following [2009] presidential candidates are either members of one of the groups or have strong ties: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Fred Thompson, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson” (emphasis mine). The international banking globalist elite used to have our brave U.S. Presidents that stood in their way assassinated. Now through money and media deception they just put their own candidate in office all the while making the American people believe that the guy they voted for actually won fair and square. You don’t think so? Ask yourself how did Obama or former President Bush raise so much money if it didn’t come mostly from Wall Street and private banker contributions? They allowed us to vote simply to make it appear like the election hasn’t been tampered with but behind the curtain, they’ve had the outcome all planned out. This is why they want to promote electronic voting and that is why we must resist switching to electronic voting. The last part of the Aaron Russo’s documentary America: Freedom To Fascism featured an official testifying in court about how there is now software that can manipulate the vote count electronically so that people think the elections are fair and that their vote is counted when in reality it isn’t. Their game is control through deception and they are good at it.

The only 2009 presidential candidates not tied to these humanity-hating globalists are Congressman Ron Paul, Alan Keys and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin. No wonder why the corporate elite didn’t give funds to their campaigns like they did to McCain’s and Obama’s campaigns.

Former Government Jesse Ventura during a scene from The Obama Deception documentary equated Republicans and Democrats to wrestlers who oppose each other in front of the cameras but behind close doors are shaking hands. To me the Republicans and Democrats are two wings of the same bird of prey. People need to realize that there’s a bigger picture here. The dominant two-party system of Republicans and Democrats and the media pushing the “left vs right” dichotomy is just another way keep us distracted and polarized so we can be conquered easier.

These globalists want us to be distracted in these trivial “left vs right” debates rather than working TOGETHER to expose their plans for a New World Order. We must get passed the “left vs right” distraction, it is not about that it is about the global elite’s plans for a one world government. There are very power international bankers and the politicians who are in their pocket, that have a vested interest in keeping you ignorant of their real agenda. “United we stand, divided we fall” remember that slogan? Well if we’re distracted and divided, we will fall and they will conquer us. We must look passed the media’s “left vs right”, Democrat vs Republican diversion and look at their controllers, the Wall Street/world banker elite.

Daniel Estulin, a investigate journalist and author of The True Story of the Bilderberg Group said in a World Net Daily article, “David Rockefeller, whose family financed the CFR, is a common denominator among these parallel groups. Not only is he the CFR chairman emeritus, but he also continues to provide financial and personal support to the TC, CFR and Bilderberg Group.” Estulin explains the agenda of these self-interested elitists is to protect their wealth and the investments of multinational banks in the growing world economy at the expense of developing nations and Third World countries. They protect their wealth by working through the Federal Reserve system and by manipulating elections to get in Presidents that will serve their purposes. The plans they pursue benefit them as well as move America and the world towards a one-world government. Those who denounce the conclusions Daniel Estulin makes in his book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group as mere speculation only need to see what David Rockefeller says in his own words as recorded in his Memoirs book. Rockefeller says, “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Dr. Stanley Monteith, a medical doctor and author of The Brotherhood of Darkness said, “most people don’t realize they exist because their minds have been conditioned to reject any thought of such organizations” And guess who conditioned them? The corporate funded puppet, none other than the “mainstream” media, which comprises most of the big cable TV network news. By and large, the globalists’ control of information has been successful because the much of the nation is still distracted their diversion tactic of ‘left’ and ‘right’, or Democrats vs Republicans whereas the real struggle is the battle between individual freedom and the globalists’ plans for an oppresive world government. And why would they elite want to control the flow of information? Well the answer lies in this motto of the Party in 1984 George Orwell’s book, “Those who control the past, control the future: who controls the present controls the past“.

The pro-world government elite not only want bigger government so that by using Hegelian Dialectics, they can save us by imposing their own “solution” they also want bigger government to control the information you currently have access to on the internet. A World NET Daily article said the following. “A pair of bills [Senate bills No. 773 and 778, called the Cybersecurity Act of 2009] introduced in the U.S. Senate would grant the White House sweeping new powers to access private online data, regulate the cybersecurity industry and even shut down Internet traffic during a declared “cyber emergency“. The article goes on to say that “the bill, however, does not define what constitutes a cybersecurity emergency, and apparently leaves the question to the discretion of the president.” So you see that they can call anyone that disagrees with their agenda a “cyber-terrorist” and then use fear to get public support for their persecution I mean prosecution of this “cyber-terrorist”. “Cyber-terrorism” will used to justify taking over control of the Internet to erase information they don’t want us to know. They’d erase Internet documentary movies like The Obama Deception and America: Freedom to Fascism and websites like EndtheFed.us and Infowars.com because they expose their deceitful agenda. I pray for the safety of brave men like Congressman Ron Paul and documentary filmmaker Alex Jones because like JFK before them they’re publicly working to promote liberty and shut down the unconstitutional Federal Reserve Bank which is just as “federal” as Federal Express. More of our politicians need to stand up and get on the record that they will work to shut down the Federal Reserve Banks and return the Constitutional right to regulate money back to the Congress and Treasury Department. Maybe if we were willing to tell our politicians: if you don’t sign a sworn affidavit declaring your intent to publicly work to shut down the Federal Reserve system we will not vote to re-elect you! Now Congressman Ron Paul has a bill to audit the Federal Reserve called HR 1207. If you haven’t done so please contact your Senator and Representative in Washington and encourage them to co-sign Ron Paul’s bill HR 1207, to audit the Fed, end their secrecy and expose what they’ve been doing with our hard earned tax money.President John F Kennedy realized the danger of having a Federal Reserve System and he tried to shut down this unconstitutional fraud. For his efforts he was assassinated by the globalists but they covered their tracks well by pinning the crime on Lee Harvey Oswald who was their fall guy. But yet the average American doesn’t know this because the Wall Street controlled media machine distorted the truthand sold the lie as the truth to the unknowing public.

Now Amendment I of the U.S Constitution says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. So among our other alienable rights, we have the right of freedom of speech and to practice it over the talk radio airwaves if we will. We have the right to discuss on the radio the things our government is doing that we as American citizens don’t like.

But when the international banking and political oligarchs are trying to work in the darkness they do not want the light of truth to break in and expose their evil deeds. No wonder why they will introduce the “Fairness Doctrine” under a different name of course, which will only affect talk radio because talk radio is trying to expose the globalist agenda and they want dissent shut down under the disguise of so called “fairness”. If it’s government imposed it is never fair. They don’t care they don’t want the people to know about how the globalists are working behind the scenes to strip America’s sovereignty away and bring her into the fold of a one world government controlled by the international bankers. Don’t you see, they don’t care about the people they care about profit and control. They don’t want you to know the truth about the unconstitutional nature of the Federal Reserve system, a private banking cartel which is run by powerful international bankers

How did we get into this mess? If you don’t learn from history you are bound to repeat it and Americans have down what the Israelites did before. In 1st Samuel chapter 8 in the Bible, the Israelites reject God as their king. They in essence they wanted human government instead of submitting to God and His Word. And because of this bad choice more often than not they ended up with cruel and unrighteous leaders. William Penn once said, “Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.” We’ve given government our children through government-run public schools, we’ve given government our income tax, some want to give government to run our healthcare, we’ve given government our property (through eminent domain) and like a zoo animal once you start feeding them they’ll want more and more until nothing’s left. Now our alienable rights come from God and can not be taken away but when we make government our God then the rights government give us they can and surely will take away. Remember the government is the PEOPLE, not the politicians. They work for us, we don’t work for them. But the more liberty we relinquish and the more power we allow them to have over our lives, obviously the less power each person will have. Soon enough we won’t be powerful enough to resist the coming totalitarian world government. Why do you think your dollar can’t buy what it used to? Because the more they print dollar bills, the more devalued the dollar becomes and the more our savings evaporate. This is another way to eventually make us more dependent on the government to take care of us and essentially make us their slaves. The globalist sect in the White House and Congress are purposely spending to increase the deficit and to crash the dollar once and for all to justify the combining of Mexico, Canada and America into one North American Union and introducing a new currency for it as the proposed solution. Government “stimulus packages” are sold to the public as a way to stimulate the economy but in truth all they do is stimulate the growth of bigger government. Ever wonder why our politicians keep our nation’s borders open and give amnesty and special treatment to the illegal aliens that are already here? Don’t you see this is the prerequisite to having a borderless North American Union? The North American Union like the current European Union is just another continental bloc along with the formation of other continent blocs will eventually give way to the thing the international banking elite through the UN is also pushing for, a world government. Again Hegelian Dialectics at work again.

In the movie The Matrix, Morpheus told Neo that the ultimate goal of the machines was to turn humans into the batteries that the machines run on. Also in 1984 the slogan for the Party was “War is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength Let’s break it down. Concerning war they want to condition us through the media’s propaganda to believe like those in 1984 that as long as an endless war on “terrorism” is going there will be peace because the government will stay on the “offensive” for the sake of our national security. Hence the phrase “war is peace”. In this sense the globalist elite want life to imitate art. And they are taking our liberties away for the sake of national security to “protect us”. Through the corporate media machine they are using fear tactics to scare us into handing over all of our liberties so that our “big brother” can protect and provide for us. In the end, they will neither protect us nor provide for us but in reality will enslave us.

Please people wake up! You have been lulled to sleep by lies and big media propaganda.

Let me make this absolutely clear. I’m not against my government, I think we have the greatest Constitutional government founded on Judeo-Christian principles that has ever existed in history. But as David stood against Goliath, I stand against the pro-world government financial and political elite who have hijacked our government and our trying to mold it along with the other world governments into a fascist one world government. You may think I’m a quack and conspiracy theorist, but I’m not asking you to take my word for it. Check it out for yourself and get informed. Knowledge of the truth is power and with it together we can resist the coming tyranny of the globalist wizards behind the curtain.

We must stop looking at current events through the corporate media lens. Not all news is corporately sponsored but the majority of major TV news sources are, so to be safe stop watching your local news stations that are corporate sponsored because the globalist bankers control the corporations which fund the news. The news outlets don’t want to lose their corporate sponsors. Therefore the news outlets remain the puppets of the globalist agenda making promotional pieces for the corporations and calling it “today’s news”. So to be balanced, get a second opinion from alternative and independently funded news outlets if you have access to them. Look for some of these alternative news sources (not run by big corporations) I’ve list on this page.

If we are informed and aware of what’s really going on we can push back the agenda of the pro- world government elite. We can’t be informed if we continually turn to the global banker/Wall Street controlled media sources and drink their Kool-Aid believing that they are giving us legitimate news that pertains to what’s really going.

Independently research the truth for yourself. Bible believing Christians especially must get informed. We must stop being heavenly-minded only Christians and speak OUT beyond the church walls against the imposing fascist world government. Our alienable rights and dignity come from God our Creator not from the state. The state can’t take them away because the state didn’t give them to us. Christians especially should know that the Bible forewarns us in the book of Revelation that Satan incarnate (the coming world dictator known as the antichrist) seeks to rule the world. His evil forces in the worldare pushing hard for a one world government but we do not know when it will come to pass. If we get right with God (2 Chronicles 7:14) and plead with Him I think with His help we could push this coming satan-inspired world governmental dictatorship back a generation or two so that it doesn’t happen in our lifetime or the lifetime of our children and grandchildren. You say, “well if it’s predicted to happen we can’t do anything about it”. Wrong! Remember, in the Bible, God warned Abraham that Sodom and Gomorrah was to be destroyed but Abraham stepped in and pleaded with God to push that event back.

Notice how they were destroyed because there wasn’t enough righteous people standing in the gap.

I believe if there’s enough people who are informed and speaking out for truth I think God will honor that and will give us the power we need to push back Satan’s plans for a world government. If we do not loudly speak up now, we may not be able to later. The ball is in your court and remember if we DO NOTHING then NOTHING HAPPENS and the status quo will remain the same.

Thomas Jefferson said, “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.”

We, Americans, have adopted the philosophy of “comfort at any cost” and that must be dropped if we are to remain free.

Copyright © 2009

Fall Of The Republic: The Presidency Of Barack H. Obama

Bankers Declare U.S. & Europe Conquered

Bankers Declare U.S. & Europe Conquered
World government now an open secret
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Thursday, July 19, 2012
A recent CNBC clip in which financial analysts admit to viewers that America is under the control of a group of central bankers who are building a world government is a damning insight into how the establishment has dispensed with any pretense of trying to hide their agenda as it is finalized.
During the video, the host asks guests, “Do we all work for central bankers – is this global governance at last – is it one world – the central bankers in charge….aren’t we all just living and dying for what the central banks do?”
“To answer your question, we are absolutely slaves to central banks,” responds the guest.  “We beholden to what central bankers and policy makers do rather than the fundamentals in the economy,” adds another.
This is just one of a deluge of examples where it is now being thrown in our faces that a banking elite is building a world government at the expense of the American people.
From treating the issue as a “conspiracy theory” for decades, the establishment is now tearing away the veil in an effort to force Americans to blithely accept what has been planned all along.
A global government is now being forcefully pushed as the “solution” to all manner of problems, but specifically in relation to financial crises. We are being brainwashed to accept the premise that centralized power in the hands of a tiny elite is the only recourse, and that a one world currency is inevitable.
At the height of the last economic crisis, Bilderberg member and Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman argued that “everything is in place” for a dictatorial world government to be imposed by a technocratic elite.
Rachman’s 2008 call for authoritarian technocrats to be put in charge of the global economy in preparation for the official birth of global government is now well on its way to completion, with the economies of France, Ireland, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Greece, along with the IMF and the European Central Bank, all under Goldman Sachs banker occupation.
These technocrats have not been bashful in openly announcing what they are doing.
Upon his selection to become EU President in 2009, Herman Van Rompuy announced that the financial crisis and efforts to combat global warming were designed to precede “the global management of our planet.” He also declared 2009 to be “the first year of global governance.”
In the same year, Van Rompuy was joined by the Pope who also called for a “world political authority” to manage the global economy.
World Bank President and Bilderberg elitist Robert Zoellick also openly admitted the plan to eliminate national sovereignty and impose a global government during a speech on the eve of the G20 summit.
Calls for a one world currency to be a key component of global governance have been consistent.
In 2000 speech, member of the executive board of the ECB, Sirkka Hämäläinen stated, “In conclusion, I should like to come back to Paul Volcker’s prophecy. He might be right, and we might one day have a single world currency. Maybe European integration, in the same way as any other regional integration, could be seen as a step towards the ideal situation of a fully integrated world.”
In a 2010 speech to the CFR, former president of the ECB Jean-Claude Trichet made it clear that the Global Economy Meeting (GEM), which meets at the BIS (Bank of International Settlements) headquarters in Basel would “become the prime group for global governance among central banks.”
Trichet added that the BIS meetings were ensuring that “the system is moving decisively towards genuine global governance.”
Trichet went on to define how global governance would operate.
“There are numerous definitions of global governance. In the economic and financial sphere I will propose that global governance comprehends not only the constellation of supranational institutions – including the international financial institutions – but also the informal groupings that have progressively emerged at the global level. Those informal forums (G7, G10, G20, etc.) are key in improving global coordination in all the areas where decision making processes remain national – whether in helping to work out agreed prudential standards and codes or to facilitate where appropriate, the coordination of economic macro-policies.”
Numerous other members of the political establishment have openly expressed the agenda to create global government. not only in response to the financial crisis but also as an answer to man-made climate change.
In 2009, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon admitted that carbon taxes levied in the name of abating global warming would be collected by a world body.
“We will establish a global governance structure to monitor and manage the implementation of this,” he stated.
In a New York Times editorial entitled “We Can Do It,” Ki-moon also wrote that efforts to impose restrictions on CO2 emissions, “Must include an equitable global governance structure.”
Fellow globalist and environmentalist David De Mayer Rothschild also disclosed the agenda for global governancein an interview with Bloomberg news.
“It’s past the point of talking. We know historically that the global governance sort of agenda to these issues is very hard to… with all the best intentions it’s very hard to actually activate.” Rothschild noted.
Similarly, Al Gore said in a 2009 speech that attempts to regulate CO2 emissions would be driven through “global governance and global agreements.”
A 2010 UN blueprint for putting the organization back at the forefront of global governance alarmingly revealed the agenda to re-brand global warming as “overpopulation” as a means of dismantling the middle classes while using “global redistribution of wealth” and increased immigration to reinvigorate the pursuit of a one world government.
Bureaucrats at the 2011 UN Climate Summit in Durban outlined plans for the most draconian, harebrained and madcap climate change treaty ever produced, under which the west would be mandated to respect “the rights of Mother Earth” by paying a “climate debt” which would act as a slush fund for bankrolling an all-powerful world government.
Earlier this year a Scientific American article entitled Effective World Government Will Be Needed to Stave Off Climate Catastrophe argued that global management of the planet was the only means of combating global warming.
Although the agenda for global government is now bearing its teeth with little regard for subtleness or stealth, the following quotes stretching back over the last several decades prove that the plan has been long in the works.
“Today America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”  — Henry Kissinger
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and their great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”  — David Rockefeller
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.”  — Strobe Talbot
“We need a global New Deal — a grand bargain between the countries and continents of this world.”
— Gordon Brown
“It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order. Pat Robertson has written in a book a few years ago that we should have a world government, but only when the Messiah arrives. He wrote, literally, any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil. Well, join me. I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”  — Walter Cronkite
“This is global governance in the making. But we must agree, and agree to a binding commitment.”
George Papandreou, former Prime Minister of Greece
“For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance. From the very earliest age, we should make environmental awareness a major theme of education and a major theme of political debate, until respect for the environment comes to be as fundamental as safeguarding our rights and freedoms. By acting together, by building this unprecedented instrument, the first component of an authentic global governance, we are working for dialogue and peace.” — Jacques Chirac
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” — David Rockefeller, from his own book, Memoirs.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Similar/Related Articles
  1. CNBC Admits We’re All Slaves to a Global Government Run by Bankers
  2. Bankers Have Seized Europe: Goldman Sachs Has Taken Over
  3. Bankers Want World Economic Government To Solve Financial Crisis They Created
  4. Bankers Destroy Global Economy by Design to Consolidate Power
  5. Audit the Fed: Bernanke and the Bankers Are Running Scared
  6. Tentative First Steps in Europe’s Self-Defense Against Zombie Bankers and Hedge Fund Hyenas
  7. Financial Terrorists Want Global Currency, Global Central Bank
  8. ECB’s Paramo: “Prepare To Give Up Significant Sovereignty”
  9. UN Chief: We Will Impose Global Governance
  10. CIA Recruiting Laid-Off Bankers in NYC
  11. “Economic Government” Would Integrate Europe To A Degree Not Seen Since The Roman Empire
  12. Libya Conquered in the Dark

The Great Banking Deception

A broken piggy bank

Have you been cheated?

In order for any contract to be valid, there must be ‘full disclosure’, ‘good faith’, ‘valuable consideration’, and ‘clean hands’.  Here is what the banks advertise: “Come to our bank.  We have money to loan you.”  Is this really what happens?
Did you really get a loan when you contracted to borrow money from the bank to pay for your home?  Or was it just an exchange (your note for cash), but the bank called it a loan?  Or did two loans occur?
When you entered into a loan contract with a bank, you signed a note or contract promising to pay the bank back, and you agreed to provide collateral that the bank could seize if you did not repay the loan.  This contract supposedly qualified you to receive the bank’s money.  But did the bank provide ‘full disclosure’ of all of the terms of this agreement?  Read the following and decide for yourself if the bank was acting in ‘good faith’, that you received ‘valuable consideration’, and that your ‘signature’ on that agreement is valid.
Bankers want you to believe that depositors deposit money at banks, banks lend the money to borrowers and the borrowers repay the money and the money is returned to the depositors who funded the loan.  If you think this is how American or Canadian banking works, you have been lied to and deceived.
The fact is the economics of today’s banking system is similar to stealing, counterfeiting and swindling and that is why the bankers cannot explain the loan details or answer specific questions.  Bankers are terrified that the details might be exposed in public court.
The banker’s own publications admit and the bank’s bookkeeping entries prove that when the banks lend money, the bankers create new money with the economics similar to counterfeiting.
If a counterfeiter counterfeits money and lends it to you, do you have any moral or legal obligation to repay the loan? NO, The law says counterfeiting is illegal and that you do not have to repay the counterfeiter.
James Madison:  “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling the money and its issuance.”
Bankers are too smart to counterfeit cash and go to jail.  They are money masters and use another method to create new money with the economics similar to counterfeiting without going to jail.  The secret involves two kinds of money. Legal tender -cash- money and non legal tender – money like checks and credit cards.  The bank’s own publication claims that money does not have to be issued by the government or be in any special form.  According to the bank’s manual, money is anything that can be sold for cash and that the banks accept as money.
The loan agreement you sign is sold to investors wanting interest.  If you do not pay the interest, they foreclose and collect the money.  The loan agreement can be sold for cash and the bankers use the loan like non-legal tender money. If you exchange $100 of cash for a $100 check the bankers acted like a moneychanger and lent you none of the bank’s money.  If the bank uses your $100,000 loan agreement like money to fund a check like cash funds a check, the banker acted like a moneychanger without the bank using or risking one cent of their money to purchase your loan agreement.
The banker got your loan agreement for free, which has the economics similar to stealing.  The banker created $100,000 of new money, which has the economics similar to counterfeiting.  Would you agree to have the banker steal your $100,000 loan agreement and use it to create $100,000 of new money and return the value of the stolen property to you as a loan?  Did you agree to be swindled?
The banker knows you would never knowingly be this stupid and that is why he cannot disclose the whole truth in court.  The bookkeeping entries prove that the borrower’s loan agreement funded the loan to the borrower. The bookkeeping entries prove that the banker merely acted like a moneychanger exchanging one kind of currency for another kind of currency and charging you as if there were a loan.  If you funded the loan to yourself, why are you paying the banker back the principle and interest?
Bankers understand the difference between money and wealth.  Money buys things.  If you could counterfeit money, you could buy the whole world and control Congress.  Wealth is anything that you can sell.  You can sell real estate, cars, gold, silver and people sell their 40 hours a week for a payroll check.  Yes, labor produces wealth. Labor produces gas for your car, food to eat and homes, cars and roads.  The banker knows that if everyone stopped working, stayed home and counterfeited money, everyone would starve to death, and no one would have gas for their cars or food to eat.  When bankers create new money and lend it to you, you must work for the banker for free to repay the loan or he forecloses and gets your home for free.
The money creator gets more of your wealth for free using a suit and tie than a gunman does pointing a gun to your head.
The banker says, “repay the loan because the bank lent you money.”  We simply ask one question: “Should the one who funded the loan be repaid the money?”  Whether they answer “YES” or “NO,” the bank must forgive the loan and zero out the debt.  That is the one question that they do not want to answer because the borrower funded the loan as proven by the bank’s own bookkeeping entries.
We are not calling the bankers criminals.  We are showing you how intelligent, creative and genius the bankers are in developing this secret.
One of the biggest bankers in America told us that the banker’s money controls who is elected into Congress, the President and judges.  He even boasted how the Banker’s loan money and advertising money controls all major media to keep it a secret.  He explained how lawyers, judges, CPAs, politicians profit from the bankers by keeping this system going and keeping it secret.  You lose and they benefit by understanding this secret.
Henry Ford: (Founder of Ford Motor Company) “It is well enough that the people of this nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.
This secret banking allows bankers to create economic booms and busts, makes the stock market go up and down as they increase and decrease the money supply.  You lose in investments as those who understand the secret transfer your investment money into their pocket.  You lose, they win.


efore an attorney can sue for foreclosure, he must show that the defending party (you) breached the agreement. The attorney needs a witness to give testimony that there is an agreement and that the agreement has been breached.

If Rich (as an example) testifies in court that there was a loan when he knew that there was only an exchange of equal value,  Rich would be giving false testimony and would be called a false witness.
In a normal court foreclosure, the lender does not come to court to give testimony.  The bank attorney uses the alleged promissory note with the alleged borrower’s signature as the witness in court to claim that there is an agreement, that there was a loan, that the lender fulfilled his agreement, and that the alleged borrower did not fulfill the agreement to repay the money.  Instead of the attorney using Rich to give oral testimony, the attorney used the promissory note as the witness as the evidence to sue the alleged borrower.
There is a legal concept of form vs. substance.  The form is the promissory note, which says that the lender lent money to the alleged borrower.  The substance is the money trail – the bookkeeping entries.  The substance shows that there were two loans exchanged – equal value for equal value.  The borrower was required to repay his loan to the bank plus interest, but the bank never repaid the debt it owes to you.  IOU was exchanged for IOU.  The two newly created IOUs cancel each other.
The Substance – the true transaction – shows that the borrower was the lender to the bank.  Then the bank repaid the loan from the borrower to the bank.  The form – the alleged bank loan agreement – shows the opposite.
Example: You sign a paper that says you were lent $10,000, but no one lent you one cent to obtain the promissory note.  A thief stole $10,000 worth of diamonds and returned the cash to you as a loan.  The form says that there was a loan; your signature also says that there was a loan.  The true transaction, though, proves that there was no loan.  The substance-money trail and the bookkeeping entries-proves that someone took something of value worth $10,000 from you, exchanged it for a different asset of equal value and returned your $10,000 to you as a loan that you now have to pay off with interest.  The attorney sues you, claiming that your signature proves that you received the loan.  You hire an expert witness to prove that there was no loan, that the substance of the transaction was an exchange, and that you were charged as if it were a loan.
Economically speaking, what is the difference if a stranger received your $10,000 worth of diamonds for free, or if he got a $10,000 lien on your property for free, or if he received $10,000 of your future payroll checks for free? The substance of the transaction is the transferal of $10,000 of property from you to the stranger for free. The transfer of wealth is precisely how bankers obtain liens on the nation’s homes, cars, farms, and businesses for free. If a robber were to use a gun to transfer your wealth, you would place him in prison.  If a banker does the same thing by using “form,” an attorney, a judge, and a sheriff, you think it is legal.
Does the attorney use the promissory note just like a witness to give false testimony in court, claiming that the lender lent money, cash or cash equivalent to the alleged borrower?  The attorney could be disbarred for bringing fraud into the court.  The substance was an exchange of value for value.  If the form and the substance disagree, one must rely on the substance over the form because substance always wins over form.
Example: You give Rich $100 for five boxes of toys.  Rich says, “Here are the five boxes.  Sign this paper that says you received the boxes.”  You sign.  Rich refuses to hand over the five boxes and claims that the form – the paper you just signed – says that you received the boxes.  You would tell the judge that you acted in good faith by signing because you were told that you would receive the five boxes standing in front of you.  After you had signed, Rich refused to let you have the boxes.  The form – the paper-says that you received the boxes, but the substance – the true transaction-clearly shows you never received what you had bargained for.  If the attorney uses the form (paper) in court to claim that you received the boxes when, in fact, he knew that you had never received then, the attorney brought fraud on the court to sue you.  The form – the paper – would be a false witness against you.
Is the promissory note used as a false witness?  The promissory note has the borrower’s signature agreeing that the lender lent the borrower money.
The attorney wants only the form – the promissory note with your signature – as a witness in court.  You want the true substance – the true transaction – and the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  Some attorney’s object to allowing the bookkeeping entries entered into court as evidence.  The attorney must rely on the form and stop the substance.
Extortion occurs when the court does not allow information into court for one’s defense.
Few people disagree that the one who provided the original funds to fund the bank loan check should be repaid the money.  Few argue that we should have equal protection and full disclosure.  The lender concealed the true substance in the agreement.
If a banker received $10,000 of capital from Joe and deposits the funds into a checking account, should the bank return the $10,000 to Joe?  If all bankers agree that the answer is “yes,” then all bank loans in America should be canceled tomorrow.
If the bank received $10,000 from Joe and lent the same $10,000 to Joe, should the bank return the $10,000 to Joe? The foreclosure attorney must argue that the bank should not return the $10,000 to Joe. Joe believed that the alleged borrower should repay the lender, and the lender should repay the one who funded the bank loan check. The foreclosure attorney must argue that the parties agreed to the terms and the one who funded the loan should never be repaid the money.  How could the judge rule in favor of the bank, claiming that the one who funded the loan should never be repaid the money?
Want proof that this is real?  Ask yourself the following questions:
  1. Were you told that the Federal Reserve Policies and Procedures and the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requirements imposed upon all Federally-insured (FDIC) banks in Title 12 of the United States Code,  section 1831n (a), prohibit them from lending their own money from their own assets, or from other depositors?  Did the bank tell you where the money for the loan was coming from?
  2. Were you told that the contract you signed (your promissory note) was going to be converted into a ‘negotiable instrument‘ by the bank and become an asset on the bank’s accounting books?  Did the bank tell you that your signature on that note made it ‘money,’ according to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), sections 1-201(24) and 3-104?
  3. Were you told that your promissory note (money) would be taken, recorded as an asset of the bank, and be sold by the bank for cash – without ‘valuable consideration‘ given to obtain your note?  Did the bank give you a deposit slip as a receipt for the money you gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when you make a deposit to the bank?
  4. Were you told that the bank would create an account at the bank that would contain this money that you gave them?
  5. Were you told that a check from this account would be issued with your signature, and that this account would be the source of the funds behind the check that was given to you as a “loan?
If you answered “No” to any of these questions, YOU HAVE BEEN CHEATED! How does that make you feel?  It is now up to you to demand your deposit back and to challenge the validity of your “signature” on any alleged bank “loan” agreement or check.  Since the banks and other lending institutions cannot allow “full disclosure” of your “loan” agreement and cannot answer your challenges about it, their silence is your key, along with important steps that we can show you step-by-step, to get your deposit back and “payoff” their alleged “loan”  to you.

Omar Rubbed Out In Cleveland – 7-19-12





Thursday, July 19, 2012

Omar Rubbed Out In Cleveland – 7-19-12



Alcuin Bramerton Twitter .. WikiLeaks Master Mirror Sites .. #1ab archive
Alcuin Bramerton profile ….. Index of blog contents ….. Home …..#1ab
Picture: Egypt’s Omar Suleiman rubbed out in Cleveland (USA)

In the early hours of Thursday 19th July 2012, Omar Suleiman (76), the West’s favourite torture master in the Middle East, “died unexpectedly” in hospital in the US. For a man of his age, he was said by those close to him to be in good health.

Suleiman and his family had been on the run from Egypt since his failed Presidential bid earlier in 2012.

Understood to be an intelligence asset of both Mossad and the CIA, Omar Suleiman knew too much about US covert operations in Egypt to be allowed to live once he was out of power.

Mainstream reportage here (19.07.12), here (19.07.12), here(19.07.12) and here (19.07.12).

Posted by John MacHaffie at 6:27




9/11 Suspects – Explosive Connections (Updated Fixed and Revised)

Most of the material for this video was adapted from Kevin Ryan’s landmark article on who had “Demolition access to the WTC Towers”:
Clean Up:

For blueprints of the WTCs with a list of all the suspicious tenants and connections check out:

Links and sources for things mentioned in the video:

Kevin R. Ryan, et al, Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials, The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1 / March, 2009, http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/

Niels H. Harrit, et al, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol 2, 2009, doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007, http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7T…

Kevin R. Ryan, The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nanothermites, Journal of 9/11 Studies, July 2008,http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf

Website for In-Q-Tel, http://www.iqt.org/technology-portfolio/index-by-practice-area.html

Wikipedia page for Jerome Hauer, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Hauer

Peter Jennings interview with Jerome Hauer, ABC, on 9/11, 14:53, available on You Tube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0Rz9ZsDAg

Akzo’s International Paint is the maker of Interchar http://www.international-pc.com/pc/pds/963to_uk.pdfhttp://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/Spinoff2006/ps_3.html

Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449 – Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete,http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5532449/description.html

Steven E. Jones et al, Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, Journal of 9/11 Studies, January 2008http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf

Albert Gibson et al, Integral low-energy thermite igniter, US Patent number: 4464989, http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=rKl1AAAAEBAJ&dq=US+4464989

Skull and Bones is a secret society at Yale University, founded in 1832. Members have included George H.W. Bush, his father Prescott Bush, his son George W. Bush, his brother Jonathan J. Bush, and many other powerful people. For LMI’s mission, see its website –http://www.lmi.org/aboutus/aboutus.aspx

Michael C. Ruppert, Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks, October 9, 2001,http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html

Kevin R. Ryan, Mahmud Ahmed’s itinerary from his Washington DC visit the week of 9/11, 911blogger.com, 11/27/2009,http://www.911blogger.com/node/21978

The agreement between LLNL and Savannah River can be found here –https://www.llnl.gov/str/News597.html

Savannah’s reference to developing sol-gels can be found here –http://srnl.doe.gov/mat_sci.htm

SEC document for Washington pre-payments –http://www.secinfo.com/dRqWm.4G1Vx.c.htm

The Ties That Bind, Descended from family business empires, six huge business groups dominate the Japanese economy, Multinational Monitor, October 1983 – http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1983/10/ties.html

Securacomm Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Incorporated, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, January 20, 1999, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1444; 166 F.3d 182, http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/1099498

Wikipedia page for Stratesec, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratesec

SEC filing for Stratesec, May 2, 1997, http://www.secinfo.com/dS7kv.82.htm

Kroll Inc website, http://www.kroll.com/about/

Wikipedia page for the Quill and Dagger Society,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_and_Dagger

The History Commons, “Wolfowitz Doctrine”,http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=us_international_relations_41 Aaron Dykes, Wolfowitz Warns of ‘Surprise like Pearl Harbor’ Months Before 9/11 Attacks, Jones Report, February 9, 2007 http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/070207_wolfowitz.htmlWolfowitz’s meeting with Mahmud Ahmed was documented in a FOIA response obtained by the 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington –http://911workinggroup.org/

Plaintiffs” Opposition to Defendant Terrence R. McAuliffe’s Motion to Dismiss, Case No: 1:98CV02859 (RCL), W.L. Meng et al vs. Bernard L. Schwartz and Loral Space et al, US District Court for the District of Columbia,http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/ois/cases/chinagate-loral/loral12500d.htm

Breaking/Confirmed: Sec Clinton Assassination Attempt in Israel

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 
Breaking/Confirmed: Sec Clinton Assassination Attempt in Israel (updated)
Posted By: Steve [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 19-Jul-2012 06:34:21

Al-Alam and Reuters Report Hillary Clinton Convoy Attack in Israel
By Gordon Duff
Israeli radio and Reuters broke the story then went mysteriously silent, an assassination attempt inside Israel, on Secretary of State Clinton.
Soon afterward, Iran’s national network, al Alam went public with a translated version which is being boycotted by news services.
Details on the unsuccessful murder attempt on America’s top diplomat below but first some background.
Possibly responsible for the assassination attempt on Clinton is this tale of deceit by Rep. Michelle Bachmann as outlined by CNN’s Andersen Cooper:
more + vids…


Justice for Bhopal


Dear friends,

A chemical leak in India killed 20,000 people, poisoned 500,000 and caused decades of disease and death. Justice could finally be served on the company responsible but only if the Indian government admits the full scale of the disaster. An international outcry created this opportunity — now sign the petition to ensure no victim is ignored.


A chemical leak in India killed 20,000 people, poisoned 500,000 and caused decades of disease and death — now survivors have a real chance to get justice from the company responsible. But the Indian government is working behind the scenes to help shield Dow Chemical from big payouts. It’s up to us to step in and bring victory to the victims.

It took weeks of public outcry to convince the government to target Dow at all for these crimes and now Home Affairs Minister Chidambaram is busy erasing almost 80% of the victims from the claim, drastically reducing the possible damages.

Public pressure forced the Minister to support the victims in the first place. Now we have the chance to make this court case a real push for justice. Join the call, when we reach 500,000 signers we will display hard-hitting billboards outside of the two posh clubs the Minister frequents in Delhi:



The Bhopal chemical spill tragedy wrecked the lives of hundreds of thousands of people and scorched the earth for generations. Yet despite this historic destruction, no justice has been served. Union Carbide, the company in charge of the plant, dodged responsibility, then was bought by Dow Chemical who have also refused to pay out fair compensation to the victims still desperate for help dealing with the loss and destruction around them.

Now, after decades of fighting for justice and a big campaign to push the Indian government to act, the petition before the Indian Supreme Court could reopen the case – paving the way to compensation from Dow to the survivors. But accurately assessing the number of victims is key to ensuring every victim gets a payout if they win. Minister Chidambaram is responsible for a brief, submitted to the court, that eliminated almost 80% of the victims as assessed by the Indian Council of Medical Research.

The Minister is likely working to protect Dow in order to keep India’s investment reputation. We can show him that justice is more important than bending the law to please big corporations! Click below to sign the petition and if we reach 500,000 signers, Avaaz will take this message directly to the front doors of the elite clubs where Chidambaram relaxes:


The Bhopal survivors need allies to win their decades long fight for justice, and we can answer their call. In the past, Avaaz has successful stood with other communities under threat from multinational companies from Guatemala to the Ivory Coast. Now let’s support the victims of Bhopal in their final push for justice.

With hope,

Meredith, Iain, Alaphia, Pascal, Emma, Ricken and the rest of the Avaaz team


The Tragedy Continues (Tehelka)

Bhopal Activists Slam U.S. Ruling (blog)

Between the flames (The Hindu)


Power Through Pretext: The Many Paths Towards Global Government | ExplosiveReports.Com


Jurriaan Maessen
July 16, 2012

“An absolute valued pretext for their absolute control model”
Aaron Dykes on the subject of “climate change” in an interview with Lord Christopher Monckton- May 23, 2012

What on earth would qualify as an adequate description of the general push towards Global Governance? How would one encapsulate the subject in one overarching catchphrase? The more you try to do so, the more impossible the task. Indeed, the sheer vastness and complexity of the globalist’s endeavor is in itself a massive wave holding a lot of researchers back, reflecting the old Nazi-concept of the bigger the lie, the easier it is to discourage those reporting on it. Yes: in the economic, political and biological spheres there is a comprehensive plan in place to seize upon crises (not one, but many), engineering them in fact- to provide the Hegelian framework for problem-reaction-solution with the aim of establishing once and for all a new world order- their new world order that is. The grandest of schemes, certainly.

Every tyrant has used certain pretexts to destroy liberty and crush dissent, deeming all means justified to accomplish its stated goals. It was either the threat by an outside force- a specter haunting the woods around the village- or some natural disaster the gods had in store for us if we did not increase our offerings double quick. It is no different in our time, where the specter manifests itself as a bearded boogieman, anthropogenic global warming, and the global financial meltdown.

One Currency To Rule Them All

On June 23, 2009, Lorenzo Bini Smaghi of the European Central Bank, gave a speech at the Aspen Institute Italia called The world after the crisis: Designing the future. A monetary order for the XXI century. In his speech, Smaghi stated:

“(…) We have been searching for a new monetary order since the fall of the Bretton Woods agreement, in the summer of 1971, and even that order was not so orderly, after all.”

Smaghi concludes that the IMF/World Bank has taken its rightful place as head honcho of the “international monetary order”, undermining the autonomy of nation-states as it proceeds with its long-term plan of a global government and a single world currency:

“The fact that the crisis has restored the IMF to its place at the heart of the international financial system should provide some hope in this respect. (…) Most of the IMF’s shareholders seem to favour making IMF financing easier. (…) In sum, a new world monetary order- (…) requires a mechanism to keep imbalances in check. Key elements of such a mechanism include a prominent role for the IMF in two essential areas: strong and effective surveillance in crisis prevention, and responsible lending, with appropriate limits and conditionality, to countries in need.”

Here it is. Surrendering national and even regional economic power to a world body, a world bank, is the main goal of the transnationalists. And all this in the name of “preventing” crises- for which- by the way- the central bankers are more often than not responsible in the first place.

In a speech delivered in 2000, member of the executive board of the ECB, Sirkka Hämäläinen stated:

“In conclusion, I should like to come back to Paul Volcker’s prophecy. He might be right, and we might one day have a single world currency. Maybe European integration, in the same way as any other regional integration, could be seen as a step towards the ideal situation of a fully integrated world. If and when this world will see the light of day is impossible to say. However, what I can say is that this vision seems as impossible now to most of us as a European monetary union seemed 50 years ago, when the process of European integration started.”

The prophecy by long-term chairman of the Fed, Paul Volcker, the speaker is referring to went something along the following lines: “if we are to have a truly global economy, a single world currency makes sense, no?” But, as it turns out, 50 years ago this process she talks about was far from impossible to imagine. In fact, as the Bilderberg memos of 1955 reveal, plans for a world government were well beyond the stage of wishful thinking or geopolitical daydreaming fifty years ago. It is- after all- a much older plan envisioned way back and pursued by the same nobility responsible for centuries of oppression in Europe. Their feudal model has been passed on from generation to generation, like the blue blood racing through their veins.

On another occasion, Hämäläinen repeated her wish for a global economic integration:

“As a longer-term vision, one should see European integration as a step towards improving global co-operation and securing peaceful and balanced development in the whole world.”

Meaning of course, global government must replace the sovereignty of the nation state of old. In this context the word “peaceful” translates to the absence of war- for once potentials rivals are eliminated, there is no longer conflict. A consolidation of power, in other words, by the central banks of the world. Jurgen Stark, at the international conference of central bankers and economic educators in 2006, presses the point that only an independent central bank should be given the instruments of setting interest rates, maintaining price stability and overseeing the economy as a whole:

“Central Bank independence is nowadays enshrined in many central bank laws and statutes around the world. In order to ensure that this achievement also prevails in the future, broad public awareness of the benefits of central bank independence is essential. Fostering and preserving such awareness requires, in particular, that the independence of a central bank, once granted, is respected by the government in question and not undermined by political interference.”

Stark describes this effort of guaranteeing the omnipotence of central banks by propagandizing people and elected governments as improving “economic literacy”. In reality it is a synchronized effort by the central banks to consolidate power and qualifying anyone who criticizes their monopoly as economically illiterate- the old Keynesian mind trick. Stark:

“Furthermore, to underpin its institutional independence, a central bank also needs to be given functional, personal and financial independence. Functional independence implies that the central bank can apply its own judgment in the conduct of monetary policy with the aim of achieving the objective specified in its mandate. A key element of a central bank’s functional independence is its lasting control over the money base and its ability to freely choose the instruments which it uses to implement its policies.”

Both the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve have claimed that political oversight and transparency will be somehow disastrous for their operations and, subsequently, the world economy. They want it all, it seems- and they want it now. The rational behind all these outrageous preconditions can be summed up with the words of Jean-Claude Trichet, the last president of the ECB, in 2005:

“We Europeans know that we can deliver structural reforms: we have done that efficiently in the past. The new state of the world is only adding new reasons to proceed in a direction which has been the European strategy since the late ‘50s, and has contributed, over almost half a century, to productivity progress, prosperity and jobs.”

In a prepared speech, condensed in spoken form at the Council on Foreign Relations headquarters in New York on April 26th 2010, Trichet discerns three ingredients of which “the significant transformation of global governance that we are engineering today” consists.

“In the area of central bank cooperation”, Trichet stated, “the main forum is the Global Economy Meeting (GEM), which gathers at the BIS (Bank of International Settlements) headquarter in Basel”.

“Over the past few years, this forum has included 31 governors as permanent members plus a number of other governors attending on a rotating basis. The GEM, in which all systemic emerging economies Central Bank governors are fully participating, has become the prime group for global governance among central banks.”

“I have participated in the G20 meetings from the very beginning.”, Trichet bragged in 2007 . On the same occasion he also described the GEM as “the most important forum for central bankers in the world, which I have the privilege to chair.”

“Overall”, Trichet continues at the CFR-meeting, “the system is moving decisively towards genuine global governance that is much more inclusive, encompassing key emerging economies as well as industrialized countries.”

Aside from the fact he accurately paraphrases the key-ingredients of Agenda 21, Trichet mentions three distinct arms of the“global governance” as envisioned by the central banks.

“The significant transformation of global governance that we are engineering today is illustrated by three examples. First, the emergence of the G20 as the prime group for global economic governance at the level of ministers, governors and heads of state or government. Second, the establishment of the Global Economy Meeting of central bank governors under the auspices of the BIS as the prime group for the governance of central bank cooperation. And third, the extension of Financial Stability Board membership to include all the systemic emerging market economies.”

Here it is again. Far from being some vague conspiracy theory, what we are hearing here- straight from the lion’s mouth- is a clear example of conspiracy fact. Trichet’s definition of Global Governance? Just so you know who exactly the money-changers are who are now screaming for one world government, here it is:

“There are numerous definitions of global governance. In the economic and financial sphere I will propose that global governance comprehends not only the constellation of supranational institutions – including the international financial institutions – but also the informal groupings that have progressively emerged at the global level. Those informal forums (G7, G10, G20, etc.) are key in improving global coordination in all the areas where decision making processes remain national – whether in helping to work out agreed prudential standards and codes or to facilitate where appropriate, the coordination of economic macro-policies.”

One currency to rule them all, one currency to find them, one currency to bring them all and in the darkness bind them- one could say, superimposing Tolkien’s Ring-mantra over the objectives of the world’s central bankers. It is ironic to hear for example George Papandreou, former Greek Prime-Minister laud the exact same global governance for which he was later sacrificed by his global string-pullers. Addressing the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009, 5 time- Bilderberg attendee, president of the Socialist International, and then prime minister of Greece, Papandreou stated that “at this time, we are observing the birth of global governance”, after which he added: “We must, however, agree to an obligation and be committed to carrying this out.”

The interesting thing is that Papandreou published a version of the same speech on his own website, but with an altered, yet certainly more revealing, text:

“This is global governance in the making. But we must agree, and agree to a binding commitment.”

He also admitted he was not there only in the capacity of Prime Minister of Greece:

“The Socialist International, which I also represent here, has proposed, among other measures, funding through an international carbon tax, green bonds or transaction taxes, transforming foreign debt into equal funds to be used by poor countries for climate change adaptation.”

Now let’s see: Papandreou attended the Bilderberg conferences of 1995, 1998, 2000, 2004 and 2005. So it may not come as any surprise that the Papandreou calls for global governance to “stop climate change”- which is of course as absurd as calling for the planet to stop turning. In between Bilderberg meetings, on May 8, 2003, the Prime Minister showed us a glimpse of the master plan, namely:

“Creating a new Europe, means creating a new concept of identity for Europe itself, for all the countries in it and to a certain extent for the world too. Europe has a unique dimension here. What is happening in this globalizing world. We are seeing the difficulties of integration into the world system, into a global village. We are seeing a difficulty in creating global governance.”

The plan of the Socialist International as well as their sugar-daddies, the Bilderbergers, is to remove any difficulties they may encounter while setting up their world government.

Crisis As Catalyzing Instrument For Global Governance

In a document written by the American National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union’s Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) titled Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture the agenda from now to 2025 for global government is outlined is outlined in some detail. It discusses the many obstacles in the quest for achieving global government:

“While not being policy prescriptive, the report shares a strong belief—as exemplified by multilateralist approaches of the US and EU governments to resolving global problems such as the recent financial crisis—that global challenges will require global solutions.”, the document reads.

Stressing that issues such as proliferation and cybersecurity are already subject to sufficient international cooperation, the document states:

“(…) we focus on such issues as intrastate conflict, resource management, migration, and biotechnology. Although recognized by many as ongoing challenges, we believe the long-term impact of these issues on the strength of the international order has not been fully appreciated.”

Recognizing that the push for global governance (which is a euphemism for global government) is meeting with increasing resistance worldwide, the authors blame a “multipolar world” for this fact:

“Diverse perspectives and suspicions about global governance, which is seen as a Western concept, will add to the difficulties of effectively mastering the growing number of challenges.”

The document also recognizes international unease with large-scale military adventures- “if (…) driven by the “West””. Furthermore, it proposes an “overall framework to manage the interrelated problems of food, water and energy.”

“Other over-the-horizon issues”, the document goes on to say, “—migration, the potential opening of the Arctic, and risks associated with the biotechnology revolution—are likely to rise in importance and demand a higher level of cooperation. These issues are difficult ones for multilateral cooperation because they involve more preventive action. Under current circumstances, greater cooperation on those issues in which the risks are not clear-cut will be especially difficult to achieve.”

The document goes on to outline several “potential scenarios” of future developments that may threaten the “international system”, the first being that “formal institutions remain largely unreformed and Western states probably must shoulder a disproportionate share of “global governance” as developing countries prevent disruptions at home. This future is not sustainable over the longer term as it depends on no crisis being so unmanageable as to overwhelm the international system.”

The second scenario projected is that of “fragmentation”, or “Powerful states and regions try to wall themselves off from outside threats.” The third scenario is the most worrisome- not according to the authors of the document, but to all of free humanity:

“Under this scenario, severe threats to the international system—possibly a looming environmental disaster or a conflict that risks spreading—prompt greater cooperation on solving global problems. Significant reform of the international system becomes possible. Although less likely than the first two scenarios in the immediate future, such a scenario might prove the best outcome over the longer term, building a resilient international system that would step up the level of overall cooperation on an array of problems. The US increasingly shares power while China and India increase their burden sharing and the EU takes on a bigger global role. A stable concert could also occur incrementally over a long period in which economic gaps shrink and per capita income converges.”

Mentioning the possibility- even desirability- of a “looming environmental disaster” or conflict as a means to establish world government is the preferred path ahead, according to the authors. But, even more disturbing that global governance to “combat” looming threats, is the possibility and desirability of “designing humans with unique physical, emotional, or cognitive abilities”, pondered upon by the US and EU intelligence councils.” Here is the quote in full:

“In addition, biotechnology—which the OECD thinks will potentially boost the GDPs of its members—can drive new forms of human behavior and association, creating profound cross cultural ethical questions that will be increasingly politically contentious. Few experts believe that current governance instruments are adequate for those challenges. For example, direct modification of DNA at fertilization is widely researched with a goal of removing defective genes; however, discussions of future capabilities open the possibility for designing humans with unique physical, emotional, or cognitive abilities.”

Global Biocratic Governance

Only a global framework, say the authors, can make sure an overall revamping of mankind will take place, including a transhumanist by global engineers to cull the overall human population. In 2009, the crisis was provided in the shape of the H1N1 virus in 2009, which resulted in an unprecedented amassing of pharmaceutical resources, providing for the first time a legitimization for the administering of vaccines to a great quantity of people worldwide. In March of 2009, the people who brought us key Pentagon documents on Strategic Information Warfare (SIW) and advisories on igniting wars with China and other “super regions”, published a document titled Initial Evaluation of the Cities Readiness Initiative. Published just a month before the “swine flu” outbreak in Mexico and subsequent created panic, the document had arrived just in time to deal with the response and readiness of cities in case of a bio-terrorist attack or, as now applied, a “naturally” occurring disease outbreak.

In the study that the RAND-corporation did at the request of the Centres for Disease Control (CDC) on the existing Cities Readiness Initiative, the infamous globalist think- tank provided a favorable review of the existing program but added a few improvements of its own. Besides several mentions of emergency response in regards to disease outbreaks- amongst which a disturbing mention of mass vaccination plans- the main thread of the piece points to an increased central planning of actions as opposed to a decentralized response coordination. The tone is set at the very start of the “technical report”, where the authors explain:

“Over the past decade, concern about the threat of bio-terrorism, pandemics, and other large-scale natural disasters has spurred large federal investments in state and local response capabilities.”

“Since 2004”, the report continues, “CRI (Cities Readiness Initiative) has expended some $300 million to improve the ability of the nation’s largest metropolitan regions to provide life-saving medications in the event of a large-scale bio-terrorist attack or naturally occurring disease outbreak. Administered by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Division of Strategic National Stockpile (DSNS), CRI seeks to help awardees respond to a large-scale anthrax attack or other large-scale public health emergency by providing antibiotics and other life-saving medical supplies to 100 percent of a planning jurisdiction’s population within a 48-hour time frame. The program currently includes 72 metropolitan regions and covers an estimated 57 percent of the of the U.S. population.”

Related to the extend of the CDC’s jurisdiction in times of such an emergency is the Division of Strategic National Stockpile (DSNS), that acts as a medical reserve in case local and state medical resources become exhausted. Lisa Schnirring, a staff writer for the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy, sums up the most prominent findings by RAND’s researchers:

“The program’s focus on a single scenario- an aerosol anthrax attack- along with specific targets has helped recipients prioritize their resources and reach out to vital partners, the authors reported. However, they found that areas with decentralized public health systems had a harder time forging relationships with other first responders, often because of the sheer number of jurisdictions.”

RAND therefore advises more central planning in regards to emergency response. Bio-terror attacks and disease outbreak are mentioned in the same breath so as to bring out a common and federal response for both later on. In a so-called “working paper” issued by the RAND corporation prepared for the U.S. Department of Health in 2007, several drills are being proposed where different departments (CDC/DSNS and others) can practice and streamline their efforts. Under the headline Embedding Drills in Routine and Small- Scale Events Might Increase Relevance, the report mentions some earlier situations in which real events were combined with emergency response drills: (page 11):

“Several jurisdictions are already using non-routine practices or small-scale emergencies to test large-scale response capabilities. For example, several jurisdictions used the influenza vaccine shortfall of 2004 as an opportunity to test the public health department’s incident command structure during an effort to mass vaccinate a large number of individuals in a single day (Seid. et al., 2006). Other jurisdictions have used annual flu clinics to test mass dispensing procedures for the SNS-program, which alleviates some of the costs associated with recruiting volunteers to act as test patients.”

In the same RAND- working paper, the authors conclude that an adequate mass counter- measure response is far from perfected and that further drills may be necessary in order to improve on the details (page 49):

“While there is strong evidence that CRI (Cities Readiness Initiative) has improved planning for mass countermeasure dispensing, we were unable to assess jurisdictions’ ability to implement their mass dispensing plans in emergency conditions. Given the rarity of large-scale public health emergencies, demonstrations of these operational capabilities must come largely through exercises.”

The RAND people advise more frequently held exercises by lack of real emergencies, to test the ability for mass dispensing plans (read: mass vaccination efforts). As we learned under the report’s “Embedding Drills in Routine and Small-Scale Events Might Increase Relevance”, real events can be used to test and further improve their effectiveness. As we have learned from the tragic events of 911, real threats and emergency response drills are not mutually exclusive as one is designed to cloak the other. More often than not the edges are blurred, so it is impossible to say where the real event ends and the exercise begins and so on. This is the true curtain of smoke behind which the globalists seek to thicken the fog of war. As all of the different divisions are compartmentalized to focus on their small part within the great infrastructure, only the people at the very top have the entire map laid down in front of them on which the chess pieces are moved around according to their designs. In light of the swine flu outbreak, we have obviously experienced a huge psyop drill to both assess the current status of centrally planned coordination of countermeasures (such as mass vaccinations) and acclimate the general public to such central coordinated actions in case of emergencies, whether real or feigned. But there is a third reason for such a psyop- and it fits in perfectly with the global agenda being pushed by the very same institutions that fostered the economic crisis, and are continuously crying for world government.

Almost six months after a mass exercise in Southeast Asia was held, the Rockefeller Foundation published a document titled The Global Challenge of Health Systems. It is a summary of Pocantico II- a meeting held under auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation with high- ranking attendees including the Deputy Secretary General of the UN, Dr. Asha-Rose Migiro. In the preface of the publication, the Foundation’s managing director Ariel Pablos-Mendez explains that all attendees are in agreement when it comes to global response and coordination needed for future “emergencies”:

“The participants agreed that the (Rockefeller) Foundation should support efforts to rethink the overall global architecture of health institutions.”

Later on in the report (page 5), the authors elaborate on these “efforts” and recent steps taken to ensure that all heads are pointed in the same direction:

“Recently a number of initiatives have been launched to help strengthen health systems, including those by Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and a network of ministers of Foreign Affairs. The Rockefeller Foundation itself is supporting a joint initiative of the United Nations and the Council on Foreign Relations to rethink the architecture of international health institutions.”

To assist in this process of “rethinking” this global architecture in regards to global pandemic outbreaks, the report mentions that:

“…The group agreed there would continue to be the rising threat of global pandemics. While new diseases may be emerging at roughly the same rate as before, the trends of globalisation speed their spread and thus increase the threat of new pandemics. Globalisation trends make it essential for health systems to improve surveillance and develop appropriate rapid response approaches.”

Slowly the picture becomes more clear, doesn’t it? As developments throughout the first decade of the 21st century have clearly showed, the global financial crisis has been seized upon as the perfect pretext for world government. The global “terrorist threat” serves the same purpose. A global pandemic outbreak, such as the 2009 H1N1 scare, was an attempt to revitalize global governance of health institutions, most notably the World Health Organization and its UN affiliates, giving the power behind the throne the tools it needs to come up with a global response.

In order to adequately maintain control, the elite mostly uses feigned events along which these policies can be moved forward. Real natural calamities are loose canons, as are genuine external threats, because they often times (though not always) refuse to align with the designs of the elite. The insincerity of the arguments in favor of a one world system is the new world order’s Achilles’ heel- and the infowarrior’s greatest weapon. Therefore by exposing the “absolute valued pretexts”, as Aaron Dykes described them, we automatically expose the salesmen pushing them. The truth is the elite’s biggest problem that refuses to go away; it’s the pebble in their shoe and, possibly, their future undoing.

Power Through Pretext: The Many Paths Towards Global Government | ExplosiveReports.Com.

Tag Cloud